All the articles published in the journal are subjected to a two-stage expert evaluation:
1st stage: Evaluation by the expert council of the journal.
2 nd stage: Works that received a positive evaluation and recommendation for publication in a scientific journal at the first stage get a double-sided (anonymous) review. The reviewer does not know the personal data of the author (s) and the author (s) do not know the personal data of the reviewer.
The chief editor (deputy chief editor) determines for the article submitted for publication a reviewer from the member of the editorial board of the journal. If necessary, additional external specialists are involved.
All the reviewers are well-known specialists with sufficient experience in their scientific field.
If the reviewer recommends an article for publication after its revision, taking into account the comments, or does not recommend an article for publication, in the review the reason for such a decision is indicated.
The reviewer sends the framed review to the editorial office by e-mail in the form of a scan copy.
In case of refusal to publish an article, the authors get a motivated refusal with copies of the reviews (nameless, not to disclose the information about the reviewer).